Follow
Adam Harkens
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
How the EU can achieve legally trustworthy AI: a response to the European Commission’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act
NA Smuha, E Ahmed-Rengers, A Harkens, W Li, J MacLaren, R Piselli, ...
Available at SSRN 3899991, 2021
1042021
Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making
J Morison, A Harkens
Legal Studies, 2019
592019
The ghost in the legal machine: algorithmic governmentality, economy, and the practice of law
A Harkens
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (1), 16-31, 2018
212018
Re-Engineering Justice? Robot Judges, Computerised Courts and (Semi) Automated Legal Decision-Making’(2019)
J Morison, A Harkens
Legal Studies 39, 618, 0
14
How the EU can achieve legally trustworthy AI: a response to the European commission’s proposal for an artificial intelligence act. SSRN Electron J
NA Smuha, E Ahmed-Rengers, A Harkens
J, 2021
52021
Algorithmic justice: dispute resolution and the robot judge?
J Morison, A Harkens
Comparative Dispute Resolution, 339-352, 2020
52020
How do" technical" design-choices made when building algorithmic decision-making tools for criminal justice authorities create constitutional dangers? Part II
K Yeung, A Harkens
arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04715, 2023
42023
Proving public law error in automated decision-making systems
J Tomlinson, K Sheridan, A Harkens
SSRN: https://ssrn. com/abstract 3476657, 2019
32019
'Rear Window Ethics' and Discrimination: The Darker Side of big Data
A Harkens
European Conference on e-Government, 267, 2016
32016
The rise of AI-based decision-making tools in the criminal justice system: implications for judicial integrity
A Harkens, K Yeung, J Felfeli, A Achtziger, P Koenig, T Krafft, W Schulz, ...
Commonwealth Judicial Journal 25 (2), 18-26, 2020
22020
Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession: Michael Legg and Felicity Bell, Oxford: Hart, 2020, 408pp,£ 75.00
A Harkens
Journal of Law and Society 49 (1), 232-237, 2022
12022
Data protection in post-Brexit Britain: a response to the government of the United Kingdom's public consultation on reforms to the data protection regime (" Data: A new direction")
W Damen, A Harkens, W Li, E Ahmed-Rengers, K Yeung
SocArXiv, 2021
12021
Not just A-levels: unfair algorithms are being used to make all sorts of government decisions
A Harkens
12020
Judicial review evidence in the era of the digital state
J Tomlinson, K Sheridan, A Harkens
Available at SSRN 3615312, 2020
12020
How Algorithmic Policing Challenges Fundamental Rights Protection in the EU: Lessons From the United Kingdom
A Harkens
The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Law in Europe (A Springer book …, 2023
2023
Book review: Three Liability Regimes for Artificial Intelligence
A Harkens
Commonwealth Judicial Journal, 2022
2022
Data protection in post-Brexit Britain
WWP Damen, A Harkens, W Li, E Ahmed-Rengers, K Yeung
2022
Digitalized judicial and administrative procedures: the case of England and Wales
A Harkens, J Tomlinson
L’action publique et le numerique, 31-44, 2021
2021
Written evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights (together with ORG, Article 19, Index on Censorship 2020)-Digital Contact Tracing Apps (NHSX)
N Chowdhury, R Coldicutt, R Corrigan, J Crowcroft, N Gervassis, ...
UK Parliament, 2020
2020
‘Written evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights
A Karanasiou, R Naik, N Chowdhury, R Coldicutt, R Corrigan, J Crowcroft, ...
2020
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20